ADVERTISEMENT

Foxtel CEO lashes media rules

Foxtel CEO Richard Freudenstein today lashed the system of media regulation in Australia as illogical, unbalanced and focused on sectional interests rather than consumers.

Addressing the American Chamber of Commerce, he called for a “rethink of the regulatory environment from first principles.”

The pay-TV executive urged that cross-media limitations, anti-siphoning regulations and restrictions on access to spectrum should be reviewed or removed, claiming they distort business decisions and stifle innovation.

He argued that emerging IPTV players (such as Foxtel’s own Presto service) and other broadband service providers should be exempt from these rules.

“The history of media regulation in Australia is littered with ad hoc decisions, compromises and special deals,” he said. “Governments of both persuasions have sought to influence media companies by doing favours to win their support or by trying to control them. Too often the default position of many media companies is to go for a regulatory solution, where a commercial one might easily be found.”

He cited the Howard government’s free allocation for the digital spectrum to the terrestrial broadcasters without any competitive process, observing, “I’ll be fascinated to see how much terrestrial high definition TV there is after the obligation to broadcast in HD expires at the end of this year.”

Freudenstein ridiculed the FTA broadcaster’s demands that Foxtel pay to retransmit their signals, claiming that would force Foxtel to pay huge sums in satellite costs each year to carry all the different regional services, which would merely replicate the terrestrial networks, costs that would be passed on to its customers.

He claimed anti-siphoning distorts competition for sports rights, unnecessarily privileges the FTA networks and reduces the money available to sporting bodies and thus the amount they can invest in elite sports and at grass roots.

And he rejected the notion that Foxtel or Fox Sports would lock up access to sports and charge high prices for them as absurd, noting the sports channels cost far less on Foxtel Play than on the main service.

Turning to online piracy, he noted the final episode of Breaking Bad was downloaded illegally in Australia more than any other country in the world, narrowly ahead of the US.

Foxtel is asking the government to take action to make it harder to download material illegally and to encourage consumers to change their behaviour. He advocated enabling content owners to seek injunctions to block pirated sites.
 

  1. Mr Freudenstein should consider the position of Foxtel’s anti-competitive business practises before he criticises the behaviour of Australian consumers. Foxtel hold licenses over all foreign content with all major foreign production companies and studios, drip feeding the rest to FTA channels and preventing sites like Hulu and Netflix from establishing themselves in the Australian market, thereby giving consumers the choice to an alternative, and better, form of content delivery.

    He wishes to keep Australians in the dark ages with his archaic cable network because he knows that the end is infact nigh for Foxtel and it’s practises if such online streaming services would be available in this country. It’s high time consumers rally against this mindset and be allowed to move ahead with the times.

    http://www.whistleout.com.au/PayTV/News/choice-calls-for-australian-netflix

    It’s not the 90’s anymore, Mr Freudenstein.

  2. This has to be a joke. One assumes that Mr. Freudenstein has all the necessary faculties to be what he is, CEO of Foxtel. I’m almost certain that he’s been misquoted.; Foxtel complaining about media laws? The global network that dominates political decisions of the Western world. The propaganda machine that Goebbels would have wished he had?
    C’mon. Pull the other one, mate.

  3. My treasured memories of Pay TV was when in 1998 my wife and I decided to subscribe to Austar TV and Austarnet, then a dial-up internet connection. Programmes were good, telephone support by Local operators was very good, and supervisor support for operators was on hand.
    There were no ads which was great, but now all that has changed, the price has gone up even though there is advertising revenue, and support now involves overseas operators, no discrimination intended, but operators are sometimes difficult to understand, and their training seems to have been a speedy proess. Australia needs more Pay TV providers.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *